PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-77.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-68.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-107.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-105.50%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-126.00%
Negative net income growth while 6247.T stands at 48.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-126.00%
Negative EPS growth while 6247.T is at 48.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-126.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is at 48.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-86.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-86.85%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
92.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
92.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6247.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
114.13%
Inventory growth well above 6247.T's 27.64%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.84%
Positive asset growth while 6247.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-10.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19.17%
Debt growth of 19.17% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.