PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.58%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.14%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while 6247.T is at 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.04%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-37.52%
Negative net income growth while 6247.T stands at 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-49.97%
Negative EPS growth while 6247.T is at 13.97%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-49.97%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is at 13.97%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
24.85%
Slight or no buybacks while 6247.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
24.85%
Diluted share change of 24.85% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.25%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-91.25%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-18.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 16.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
101.91%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 50.62% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
101.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 50.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
620.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 183.17%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 6.44%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.23%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6247.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
12.45%
We show growth while 6247.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.28%
Positive asset growth while 6247.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-12.52%
We have a declining book value while 6247.T shows 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.66%
Debt growth of 8.66% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
We expand SG&A while 6247.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.