PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.71%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 24.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 6247.T's 60.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
17.14%
EBIT growth below 50% of 6247.T's 78.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.49%
Operating income growth under 50% of 6247.T's 151.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
25.25%
Net income growth under 50% of 6247.T's 85.46%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.24%
EPS growth under 50% of 6247.T's 85.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.24%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 6247.T's 85.47%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.89%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-92.89%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-35.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 37.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
101.74%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
101.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-78.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T is 317.94%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-72.49%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6247.T stands at 13.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-72.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6247.T is at 13.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
107.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 12.56%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.74%
AR growth of 12.74% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-18.22%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.90%
Negative asset growth while 6247.T invests at 2.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
123.46%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 6.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-49.63%
We’re deleveraging while 6247.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.35%
SG&A growth well above 6247.T's 12.52%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.