PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.17%
Positive revenue growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
41.38%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
473.50%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
226.92%
Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2675.78%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2573.08%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2573.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.54%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-82.54%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
76.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 11.80%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to 6247.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
105.52%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
105.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
275.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
201.71%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 15.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.87%
AR growth of 24.87% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-20.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-18.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 1.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-23.41%
We’re deleveraging while 6247.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
We expand SG&A while 6247.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.