PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
173.63%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 8.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
118.47%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
297.38%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
201.65%
Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
205.97%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
204.68%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
204.68%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.05%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-88.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-18.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 6.08%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.49%
Below 50% of 6247.T's 301.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-86.57%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
336.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 41.68%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6247.T is at 24.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
207.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 20.95%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
AR growth of 45.92% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-7.52%
Inventory is declining while 6247.T stands at 8.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.44%
Similar asset growth to 6247.T's 3.72%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.68%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 2.88%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
10.50%
Debt growth of 10.50% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.35%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 6247.T's 7.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.