PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
121.05%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
108.01%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
61.51%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.71%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 4.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
58.64%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
58.52%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
58.52%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.56%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 37.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-25.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 15.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.13%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6247.T's 181.08%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
43.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-153.66%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 32.12%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
116.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 25.18%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.59%
AR growth of 54.59% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
4.22%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 6247.T's 10.61%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
10.11%
Positive asset growth while 6247.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.13%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
14.18%
We have some new debt while 6247.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.04%
We expand SG&A while 6247.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.