PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.18%
Positive revenue growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
42.47%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
250.30%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
217.02%
Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
197.84%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
197.58%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
197.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.23%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
19.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 6247.T's 24.23%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
34.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 4.15%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 6247.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
35.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 30.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
150.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 28.09%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.94%
AR growth of 7.94% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-4.53%
Inventory is declining while 6247.T stands at 7.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.21%
Asset growth well under 50% of 6247.T's 4.23%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.23%
Under 50% of 6247.T's 3.66%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.11%
We’re deleveraging while 6247.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.84%
We cut SG&A while 6247.T invests at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.