PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.75%
Revenue growth similar to 6247.T's 24.81%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
65.99%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
52.93%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
59.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 17.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
39.28%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.31%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.31%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.18%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-56.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 15.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 6.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 20.74% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-100.43%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1159.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 20.48%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
12.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 5.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.17%
AR growth of 34.17% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
30.87%
We show growth while 6247.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
18.56%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.04%
We have a declining book value while 6247.T shows 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
63.62%
Debt growth of 63.62% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.