PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.09%
Positive revenue growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
99.89%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-98.17%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
91.66%
Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-105.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.42%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.42%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.65%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
52.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 9.53%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
36.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 3.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-133.12%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
31.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 26.75%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 31.05%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
33.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 8.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.92%
Our AR growth while 6247.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.03%
Inventory growth well above 6247.T's 20.99%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 3.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.21%
We have a declining book value while 6247.T shows 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
22.00%
Debt growth of 22.00% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.64%
SG&A growth well above 6247.T's 6.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.