PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.12%
Positive revenue growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
83.86%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
157.15%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
156.65%
Positive operating income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.24%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
103.25%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
103.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6247.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-25.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6247.T stands at 47.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
10.49%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 6247.T's 32.38%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.17%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 26.30% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-96.98%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6247.T is 149.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T is 178.77%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 14.24%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
29.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 1.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.18%
AR growth well above 6247.T's 1.65%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.15%
Inventory growth well above 6247.T's 9.32%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
8.03%
Positive asset growth while 6247.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.51%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
16.11%
Debt growth of 16.11% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
We expand SG&A while 6247.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.