1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of 6247.T's 43.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
33.30%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 29.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
237.33%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 49.72%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
183.77%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of 6247.T's 240.88%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
171.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 67.05%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
171.48%
EPS growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 67.21%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
171.14%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 67.10%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 6247.T's 0.08%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.60%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6247.T stands at 53.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
65.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 33.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
15.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 11.99%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.82%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 6247.T's 155.07%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
126.35%
Below 50% of 6247.T's 498.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
110.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 4.53%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
430.44%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 47.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
66.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 22.39%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
22.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 8.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.05%
AR growth well above 6247.T's 6.20%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
15.00%
We show growth while 6247.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.49%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 1.91%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.63%
Under 50% of 6247.T's 2.04%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
20.25%
We have some new debt while 6247.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.94%
We increase R&D while 6247.T cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
30.22%
SG&A growth well above 6247.T's 5.41%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.