1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.36%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 5.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
40.59%
Positive gross profit growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
598.26%
Positive EBIT growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
384.97%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 15.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
292.56%
Positive net income growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
292.37%
Positive EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
292.37%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.81%
OCF growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 1.85%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
2.81%
FCF growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 1.85%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
23.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6247.T's 45.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
67.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 14.96%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
116.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 16.40%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1556.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
163.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
158.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 63.73%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
118.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 39.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
43.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 16.84%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
32.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 10.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.97%
AR growth well above 6247.T's 15.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.23%
Inventory growth well above 6247.T's 1.67%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.15%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 2.02%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.30%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.44%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
12.26%
Debt growth far above 6247.T's 8.14%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
3.28%
We increase R&D while 6247.T cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-17.24%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.