PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.60%
Positive revenue growth while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-7.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-24.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-24.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.81%
Negative net income growth while 6247.T stands at 84.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.79%
Negative EPS growth while 6247.T is at 86.77%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.79%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is at 86.77%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 47.01%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
52.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6247.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
790.14%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 567.43%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
42.26%
Below 50% of 6247.T's 99.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
69.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6247.T's 62.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
140.71%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 34.23%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
58.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 15.46%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
35.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 10.94%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.29%
Our AR growth while 6247.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 6247.T's 13.99%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
13.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 2.11%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 0.73%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
26.34%
Debt growth of 26.34% while 6247.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
We expand SG&A while 6247.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.