PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.71%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 6247.T's 57.76%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
18.08%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 6247.T's 49.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-40.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 6247.T is at 406.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-39.22%
Negative operating income growth while 6247.T is at 206.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-66.67%
Negative net income growth while 6247.T stands at 56.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-66.68%
Negative EPS growth while 6247.T is at 59.49%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-66.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6247.T is at 59.49%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 6247.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 6247.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.19%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to 6247.T's 92.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
10.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 6247.T's 57.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6247.T's 61.43%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 6247.T is at 267.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-76.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6247.T is 332.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6247.T is 146.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
117.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 28.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
49.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 21.22%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
29.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6247.T's 13.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 6247.T's 6.24%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-19.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.37%
Negative asset growth while 6247.T invests at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while 6247.T shows 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-15.39%
We’re deleveraging while 6247.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.21%
SG&A growth well above 6247.T's 7.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.