PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.79%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
81.56%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
66.67%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
207.69%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
207.73%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
207.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6617.T is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6617.T is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.05%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
56.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 18.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 15.93%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
232.74%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 599.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
519.38%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 2560.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
730.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
130.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 25.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
55.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 30.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
34.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 18.53%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.29%
Our AR growth while 6617.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
12.63%
Inventory growth well above 6617.T's 10.01%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.81%
Positive asset growth while 6617.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.25%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
15.08%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.