PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
176.32%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
314.14%
Positive gross profit growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
284.85%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
183.92%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
146.73%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
146.73%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
146.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
196.35%
OCF growth of 196.35% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
196.35%
FCF growth of 196.35% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-22.91%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-22.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 15.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.98%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 599.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
125.98%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 2560.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
125.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.