PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.52%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-20.82%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-58.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-83.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-119.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-101.98%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-101.98%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
908.96%
Share count expansion well above 6617.T's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
908.96%
Diluted share count expanding well above 6617.T's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-155.26%
Negative OCF growth while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-155.26%
Negative FCF growth while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-89.31%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-89.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-89.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 15.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
92.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 92.13% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
92.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 92.13% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
92.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 92.13% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
99.63%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 599.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
99.63%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 2560.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
99.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Inventory is declining while 6617.T stands at 10.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.80%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-90.74%
We have a declining book value while 6617.T shows 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.22%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.