PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.78%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
89.02%
Positive gross profit growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
204.72%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
370.86%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
521.83%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
522.24%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
522.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
436.73%
OCF growth of 436.73% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
436.73%
FCF growth of 436.73% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-88.96%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-88.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-88.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 15.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-80.93%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-80.93%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-80.93%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
106.67%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 599.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
106.67%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 2560.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
106.67%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-87.23%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6617.T stands at 25.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-87.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6617.T is at 30.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-87.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 6617.T is at 18.53%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.20%
Inventory is declining while 6617.T stands at 10.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-9.55%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
31.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.