1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-77.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-68.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-107.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-105.50%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-126.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-126.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-126.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-86.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-86.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 15.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.83%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 599.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
92.83%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 2560.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
92.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
114.13%
Inventory growth well above 6617.T's 10.01%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.84%
Positive asset growth while 6617.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-10.09%
We have a declining book value while 6617.T shows 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.17%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.