PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
172.45%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
100.26%
Positive gross profit growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
710.40%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
898.49%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
233.87%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
233.92%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
233.92%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6617.T is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-90.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 15.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
105.34%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 599.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
105.34%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 2560.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-79.44%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 6617.T is at 18.53%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.07%
Inventory is declining while 6617.T stands at 10.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.14%
We expand SG&A while 6617.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.