PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.71%
Revenue growth of 38.71% while 6617.T is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
14.85%
Gross profit growth of 14.85% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
17.14%
EBIT growth of 17.14% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
33.49%
Operating income growth of 33.49% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
25.25%
Net income growth of 25.25% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
25.24%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-92.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-35.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
101.74%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 101.74% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
101.74%
Net income/share CAGR of 101.74% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-78.48%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-72.49%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-72.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
107.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 107.07% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.74%
AR growth of 12.74% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-18.22%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.90%
Negative asset growth while 6617.T invests at 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
123.46%
Positive BV/share change while 6617.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-49.63%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.35%
SG&A growth of 6.35% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.