PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
123.92%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
59.80%
Positive gross profit growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
472.45%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
382.35%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
114.35%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
114.72%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
114.72%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.68%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-90.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-7.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
100.28%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 100.28% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
100.28%
Net income/share CAGR of 100.28% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
105.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 105.50% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 183.61% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.24%
Our AR growth while 6617.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.64%
Inventory is declining while 6617.T stands at 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
15.71%
Positive asset growth while 6617.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.73%
Positive BV/share change while 6617.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
18.91%
Debt growth far above 6617.T's 12.79%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.89%
SG&A growth well above 6617.T's 5.48%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.