1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.62%
Negative revenue growth while 6617.T stands at 40.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-33.51%
Negative gross profit growth while 6617.T is at 77.87%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-111.85%
Negative EBIT growth while 6617.T is at 257.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-117.20%
Negative operating income growth while 6617.T is at 224.23%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-137.24%
Negative net income growth while 6617.T stands at 285.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-136.70%
Negative EPS growth while 6617.T is at 285.82%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-136.70%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is at 285.82%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-8.51%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-27.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.07%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 99.07% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-153.08%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-130.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
185.73%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.64%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 6617.T's 21.28%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.51%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 6617.T's 8.66%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.48%
Asset growth well under 50% of 6617.T's 4.53%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.26%
Under 50% of 6617.T's 1.92%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
23.08%
Debt growth far above 6617.T's 15.66%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.10%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.