PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
60.43%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 32.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
95.88%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 17.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1795.68%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1274.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 28.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
742.67%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
760.00%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
760.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.82%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 35.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-16.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 35.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-32.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 35.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.34%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 6617.T's 160.11%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-46.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6617.T is 160.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-45.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is 160.11%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-67.62%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
143.76%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
119.32%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.10%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 6617.T's 27.24%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-37.71%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-15.37%
Negative asset growth while 6617.T invests at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
9.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.02%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-37.98%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.31%
We expand SG&A while 6617.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.