1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.18%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 6617.T's 16.39%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
42.47%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 6617.T's 61.78%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
250.30%
EBIT growth 75-90% of 6617.T's 286.49%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
217.02%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 6617.T's 302.89%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
197.84%
Net income growth at 50-75% of 6617.T's 293.95%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
197.58%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 6617.T's 293.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
197.58%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 6617.T's 293.95%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.23%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
19.03%
5Y CAGR of 19.03% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
34.41%
3Y CAGR of 34.41% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.00%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 102.00% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
35.99%
Net income/share CAGR of 35.99% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
4.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 4.90% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
150.93%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.94%
AR growth well above 6617.T's 9.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-4.53%
Inventory is declining while 6617.T stands at 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.21%
Asset growth at 75-90% of 6617.T's 1.52%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
1.23%
1.25-1.5x 6617.T's 0.87%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-3.11%
We’re deleveraging while 6617.T stands at 8.97%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.