PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.66%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 6617.T's 32.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
59.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 24.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
246.35%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 14.63%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
278.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 66.88%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
273.35%
Net income growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 28.79%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
270.85%
EPS growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 28.80%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
270.85%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 28.80%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.31%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 26.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 26.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
36.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6617.T's 26.43%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.45%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 216.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-18.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6617.T is 216.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
212.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to 6617.T's 216.93%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-67.71%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
152.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.05%
Firm’s AR is declining while 6617.T shows 38.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.64%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-16.98%
Negative asset growth while 6617.T invests at 1.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.49%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-48.16%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.