PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.75%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
65.99%
Positive gross profit growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
52.93%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
59.53%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
39.28%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.31%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.31%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.18%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 28.56%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-56.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 28.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 28.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.04%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6617.T's 82.21%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-100.43%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6617.T is 82.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1159.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is 82.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.10%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
12.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.10%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.17%
Our AR growth while 6617.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
30.87%
Inventory growth well above 6617.T's 10.08%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
18.56%
Positive asset growth while 6617.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.04%
We have a declining book value while 6617.T shows 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
63.62%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.99%
We cut SG&A while 6617.T invests at 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.