PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.09%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
99.89%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 10.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-98.17%
Negative EBIT growth while 6617.T is at 221.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
91.66%
Operating income growth under 50% of 6617.T's 334.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-105.57%
Negative net income growth while 6617.T stands at 166.54%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-105.42%
Negative EPS growth while 6617.T is at 166.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-105.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is at 166.95%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 6617.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.65%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
52.54%
5Y CAGR of 52.54% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
36.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.37%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 99.37% while 6617.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-133.12%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
31.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.28%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
33.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 2.61%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.92%
Our AR growth while 6617.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.03%
We show growth while 6617.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
9.64%
Positive asset growth while 6617.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.21%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.00%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.64%
We expand SG&A while 6617.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.