PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.95%
Positive revenue growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
33.30%
Positive gross profit growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
237.33%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
183.77%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
171.36%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
171.48%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
171.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 6617.T's 0.05%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.60%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T stands at 8.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
65.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
15.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.82%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 6617.T's 167.05%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
126.35%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 476.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
110.78%
Below 50% of 6617.T's 249.22%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
430.44%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 8.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
66.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 8.29%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
22.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 5.36%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.05%
Our AR growth while 6617.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
15.00%
Inventory growth well above 6617.T's 9.75%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
11.49%
Positive asset growth while 6617.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.63%
Under 50% of 6617.T's 1.56%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
20.25%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.94%
We increase R&D while 6617.T cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
30.22%
SG&A growth well above 6617.T's 22.24%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.