PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
119.74%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 21.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
106.31%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 6.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
630.40%
Positive EBIT growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
476.51%
Positive operating income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
531.62%
Positive net income growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
531.75%
Positive EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
531.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
67.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 23.37%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-1.30%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 6617.T stands at 22.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
2.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 6617.T's 28.46%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
411.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 125.83% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-8.27%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 6617.T is 16.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-18.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 6617.T is 327.55%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
127.28%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 23.52%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
43.12%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 21.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
27.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 6617.T's 18.33%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.72%
AR growth well above 6617.T's 16.42%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-27.32%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.69%
Asset growth well under 50% of 6617.T's 6.62%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
8.24%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 2.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
7.36%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
12.22%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 6617.T's 6.66%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
41.42%
SG&A growth well above 6617.T's 39.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.