PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.60%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 8.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-7.70%
Negative gross profit growth while 6617.T is at 19.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.53%
Negative EBIT growth while 6617.T is at 139.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.68%
Negative operating income growth while 6617.T is at 172.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.81%
Negative net income growth while 6617.T stands at 168.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.79%
Negative EPS growth while 6617.T is at 168.21%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.79%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 6617.T is at 169.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
52.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 5.35%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
24.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 10.16%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
790.14%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 0.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
42.26%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 6617.T's 50.82%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
69.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while 6617.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
140.71%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 31.05%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
58.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 27.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
35.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 6617.T's 17.53%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.29%
Our AR growth while 6617.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.50%
Inventory growth well above 6617.T's 6.18%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 1.09%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 1.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
26.34%
We have some new debt while 6617.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
We expand SG&A while 6617.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.