PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-68.91%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is -5.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-77.36%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is -4.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-159.79%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is -2.13%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-169.49%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is -5.66%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-182.97%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is -1.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-183.00%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-183.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.94%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 22.54%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
4.60%
Below 50% of Industrials median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-8.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 9.38%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.54%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Industrials median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
23.05%
Below 50% of Industrials median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-73.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 23.68%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 21.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
137.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 17.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.77%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
43.91%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
5.44%
Asset growth of 5.44% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-2.72%
Negative BV/share change while Industrials median is 0.07%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
22.61%
Debt growth of 22.61% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-11.91%
SG&A decline while Industrials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.