PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-65.89%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is -6.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-75.27%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is -4.45%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-143.06%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is -0.40%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-144.21%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is -4.40%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-146.51%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is -3.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-146.81%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is -1.83%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-146.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is -1.83%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 20.62%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-37.58%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 12.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-6.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 7.16%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.24%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 53.04% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
57.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 24.22%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-150.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Industrials median is 18.50%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 19.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
15.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Industrials median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
44.95%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
6.40%
We expand assets while Industrials is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-4.48%
Negative BV/share change while Industrials median is -0.29%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
45.19%
Debt growth of 45.19% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
35.66%
SG&A growth of 35.66% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.