PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-77.57%
Negative revenue growth while Industrials median is -3.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-73.55%
Negative gross profit growth while Industrials median is -2.08%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-116.51%
Negative EBIT growth while Industrials median is -0.70%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-118.68%
Negative operating income growth while Industrials median is -3.11%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-121.43%
Negative net income growth while Industrials median is -1.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-121.44%
Negative EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-121.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Industrials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.61%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Industrials median is 28.15%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
50.02%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 19.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
85.71%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Industrials median of 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.63%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Industrials median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
-139.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Industrials median is 47.94%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
32.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Industrials median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 30.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
36.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Industrials median of 15.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.76%
AR shrinking while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
21.96%
Inventory growth far above Industrials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-2.55%
Assets shrink while Industrials median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.55%
Negative BV/share change while Industrials median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
11.29%
Debt growth of 11.29% while Industrials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-81.04%
R&D dropping while Industrials median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-20.42%
SG&A decline while Industrials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.