PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.35%
Revenue growth below 50% of 4997.T's 22.86%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.54%
Cost growth 50-75% of 4997.T's 17.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-3.36%
Gross profit decline while 4997.T shows 33.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.42%
Margin decline while 4997.T shows 8.59% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 4997.T shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.88%
Other expenses growth while 4997.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 4997.T's 28.82%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.74%
Total costs growth 50-75% of 4997.T's 21.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
23.92%
Interest expense growth while 4997.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-104.93%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-349.62%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-307.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.20%
Operating income decline while 4997.T shows 114.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.12%
Operating margin decline while 4997.T shows 112.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11236.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-36.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
72.01%
Tax expense growth while 4997.T reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.32%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.32%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.