PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.52%
Revenue decline while 5715.T shows 16.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.48%
Cost reduction while 5715.T shows 15.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.82%
Gross profit decline while 5715.T shows 24.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-17.93%
Margin decline while 5715.T shows 6.49% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
Other expenses growth while 5715.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.03%
Operating expenses growth while 5715.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.43%
Total costs growth less than half of 5715.T's 13.73%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.18%
Interest expense reduction while 5715.T shows 3.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.55%
D&A growth while 5715.T reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-34.68%
EBITDA decline while 5715.T shows 62.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.30%
EBITDA margin decline while 5715.T shows 39.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.12%
Operating income decline while 5715.T shows 1723.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.51%
Operating margin decline while 5715.T shows 1462.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.18%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 5715.T's 77.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-119.39%
Pre-tax income decline while 5715.T shows 243.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while 5715.T shows 223.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.67%
Tax expense reduction while 5715.T shows 245.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-119.94%
Net income decline while 5715.T shows 230.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.67%
Net margin decline while 5715.T shows 211.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.98%
EPS decline while 5715.T shows 230.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.98%
Diluted EPS decline while 5715.T shows 230.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
908.96%
Share count increase while 5715.T reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
908.96%
Diluted share increase while 5715.T reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.