PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-74.56%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-75.66%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-63.83%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.16%
Margin expansion while 5715.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.40%
R&D growth while 5715.T reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 5715.T's 189.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-17.12%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-72.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-51.58%
Interest expense reduction while 5715.T shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-96.74%
D&A reduction while 5715.T shows 337.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-101.35%
EBITDA decline while 5715.T shows 0.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-105.29%
EBITDA margin decline while 5715.T shows 11.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-121.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-186.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
362.57%
Other expenses growth while 5715.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-106.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-126.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-109.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-136.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.36%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.36%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.