PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 5715.T's 14.85%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
34.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 13.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.70%
Gross profit decline while 5715.T shows 23.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-26.51%
Margin decline while 5715.T shows 7.14% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.60%
Operating expenses growth while 5715.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.50%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 5715.T's 11.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.75%
Interest expense change of 11.75% while 5715.T maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.90%
D&A reduction while 5715.T shows 0.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.52%
EBITDA decline while 5715.T shows 69.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.13%
EBITDA margin decline while 5715.T shows 47.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.68%
Operating income decline while 5715.T shows 146.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.03%
Operating margin decline while 5715.T shows 115.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.65%
Other expenses growth while 5715.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.04%
Tax expense reduction while 5715.T shows 9.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.79%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.79%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.