PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.52%
Revenue decline while 6203.T shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.48%
Cost reduction while 6203.T shows 4.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.82%
Gross profit decline while 6203.T shows 11.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-17.93%
Margin decline while 6203.T shows 6.19% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
Other expenses growth while 6203.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.03%
Operating expenses growth while 6203.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.43%
Total costs growth less than half of 6203.T's 1.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.18%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.55%
D&A growth above 1.5x 6203.T's 2.91%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-34.68%
EBITDA decline while 6203.T shows 93.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.30%
EBITDA margin decline while 6203.T shows 93.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.12%
Operating income decline while 6203.T shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.51%
Operating margin decline while 6203.T shows 43.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.18%
Other expenses growth while 6203.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-119.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-119.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.98%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.98%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
908.96%
Share count increase while 6203.T reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
908.96%
Diluted share increase while 6203.T reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.