PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-77.57%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-78.10%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-73.55%
Gross profit decline while 6247.T shows 2.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
17.94%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 6247.T's 6.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-81.04%
R&D reduction while 6247.T shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
81.28%
Similar other expenses growth to 6247.T's 102.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-20.32%
Operating expenses reduction while 6247.T shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-74.79%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-35.45%
Interest expense reduction while 6247.T shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.34%
D&A reduction while 6247.T shows 329.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-104.49%
EBITDA decline while 6247.T shows 6.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.02%
EBITDA margin decline while 6247.T shows 11.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-183.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.69%
Other expenses growth while 6247.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-119.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-186.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.85%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-121.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-195.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.