PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.28%
Positive growth while 6247.T shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.92%
Cost increase while 6247.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
14.06%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of 6247.T's 23.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-3.56%
Margin decline while 6247.T shows 26.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.29%
R&D growth less than half of 6247.T's 296.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.41%
Other expenses reduction while 6247.T shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.45%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 1.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.75%
Total costs growth while 6247.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.51%
Interest expense change of 5.51% while 6247.T maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
39.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 2.75%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
12.98%
EBITDA growth while 6247.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
41.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of 6247.T's 98.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.47%
Operating margin growth below 50% of 6247.T's 103.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-122.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.97%
Pre-tax income growth while 6247.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
343.32%
Tax expense growth while 6247.T reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-38.44%
Net income decline while 6247.T shows 5.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.95%
Net margin decline while 6247.T shows 8.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.37%
EPS decline while 6247.T shows 5.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.09%
Diluted EPS decline while 6247.T shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while 6247.T shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while 6247.T shows 0.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.