PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.71%
Revenue growth 50-75% of 6247.T's 57.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
35.26%
Cost growth 50-75% of 6247.T's 60.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
18.08%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 6247.T's 49.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
50.12%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 6247.T's 7.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
36.75%
Similar total costs growth to 6247.T's 48.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
42.09%
Interest expense growth less than half of 6247.T's 102.81%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.24%
D&A reduction while 6247.T shows 31.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-32.29%
EBITDA decline while 6247.T shows 249.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.98%
EBITDA margin decline while 6247.T shows 121.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.22%
Operating income decline while 6247.T shows 206.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.20%
Operating margin decline while 6247.T shows 94.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-50.92%
Pre-tax income decline while 6247.T shows 45.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.29%
Tax expense reduction while 6247.T shows 8.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-66.67%
Net income decline while 6247.T shows 56.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.68%
EPS decline while 6247.T shows 59.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.68%
Diluted EPS decline while 6247.T shows 59.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count increase while 6247.T reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.00%
Diluted share increase while 6247.T reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.