1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
33.68%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 6617.T's 0.88%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
25.25%
Cost growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 1.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
82.08%
Positive growth while 6617.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
36.20%
Margin expansion while 6617.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.08%
Similar operating expenses growth to 6617.T's 4.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
22.33%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 6617.T's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
59.84%
Interest expense growth while 6617.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.99%
D&A growth while 6617.T reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
369.17%
EBITDA growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
250.97%
EBITDA margin growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2700.00%
Operating income growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1994.55%
Operating margin growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-666.67%
Other expenses reduction while 6617.T shows 666.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1978.57%
Pre-tax income growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1454.88%
Pre-tax margin growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2450.00%
Tax expense growth while 6617.T reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
994.44%
Net income growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
718.70%
Net margin growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
995.04%
EPS growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
995.04%
Diluted EPS growth while 6617.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while 6617.T shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while 6617.T shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.