111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-14.20%
Cash & equivalents declining -14.20% while SUM's grows 36.91%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-100.00%
Both SUM and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-22.35%
Below half of SUM's 36.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
26.24%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SUM's 3.79%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
1.83%
Inventory growth below half of SUM's -1.11%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1495.65%
Other current assets growth < half of SUM's -8.47%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
6.38%
Below half of SUM's 14.30%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
3.67%
Below half SUM's -1.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
1.73%
Less than half of SUM's -1.12%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
2.57%
Less than half of SUM's -6.54%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
1.81%
Less than half of SUM's -1.53%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-2.73%
Both SUM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.94%
Less than half of SUM's 0.04%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.06%
Below half of SUM's -1.49%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
≥ 1.5x SUM's 1.36%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
18.94%
Less than half of SUM's -2.53%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-2.74%
Less than half of SUM's 33.33%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Below half of SUM's 10.08%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
Less than half of SUM's -14.33%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-0.32%
Less than half of SUM's -3.66%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
10.73%
Above 1.5x SUM's 0.20%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Less than half of SUM's 9.00%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
12.67%
1.25-1.5x SUM's 9.80%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier unknown future burdens.
3.92%
Above 1.5x SUM's 0.60%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.67%
Less than half of SUM's -0.02%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.35%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SUM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.13%
Below half SUM's 11.48%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SUM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.81%
≥ 1.5x SUM's 2.63%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
1.50%
1.25-1.5x SUM's 1.36%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-100.00%
Both SUM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.96%
Less than half of SUM's -0.94%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.68%
Less than half of SUM's -9.54%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
