111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-47.78%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-47.78% vs SUM's -57.58%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to SUM's zero value, indicating better performance.
-47.78%
Cash + STI yoy 0.75-0.9x SUM's -57.58%. Bill Ackman would wonder if competitor is building liquidity more aggressively.
6.46%
Receivables growth less than half of SUM's 56.73%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.64%
Inventory growth below half of SUM's 40.25%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-87.48%
Similar to SUM's -94.87%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
-18.81%
0.75-0.9x SUM's -22.35%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
5.38%
Below half SUM's 123.83%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
10.56%
Less than half of SUM's 62.51%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
5.00%
Less than half of SUM's 163.78%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
9.99%
Less than half of SUM's 67.84%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-31.03%
Both SUM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
2233.91%
Less than half of SUM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-907.09%
Less than half of SUM's 83.08%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.67%
Below half of SUM's 98.54%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.39%
Below half of SUM's 57.87%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-13.31%
Less than half of SUM's 135.33%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
74.01%
Similar yoy changes to SUM's 98.19%. Walter Schloss finds a parallel approach to short-term funding.
-40.31%
Below half of SUM's 111.17%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-42.72%
≥ 1.5x SUM's -27.02%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-55.10%
Less than half of SUM's 50.24%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-0.16%
Less than half of SUM's 61.63%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
10.47%
Less than half of SUM's 21.42%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both SUM and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-1.97%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SUM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-57.24%
Less than half of SUM's 67.81%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.52%
Less than half of SUM's 35.03%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Less than half of SUM's 38.06%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.68%
Less than half of SUM's 46.74%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-2.50%
Below half SUM's -7.63%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-42.84%
Similar yoy to SUM's -49.28%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
-122.20%
50-75% of SUM's -200.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer expansions in these equity lines.
-4.02%
Below half SUM's 82.86%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.39%
Below half SUM's 57.87%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-1.77%
Both SUM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
7.87%
Less than half of SUM's 24.06%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
60.60%
50-75% of SUM's 105.75%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
