PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1620.28%
Net income growth above 1.5x CPAC's 47.65%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
27.95%
Some D&A expansion while CPAC is negative at -12.74%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.14%
SBC growth of 23.14% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
200.00%
Slight usage while CPAC is negative at -114.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-363.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CPAC at -577.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
116.72%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. CPAC's 483.95%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Some yoy usage while CPAC is negative at -145.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-190.32%
Both negative yoy, with CPAC at -804.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
318.04%
Some CFO growth while CPAC is negative at -44.90%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-18.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -38.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
80.16%
Acquisition growth of 80.16% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -106.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -1443.52%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -1443.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Buyback growth of 200.00% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.