PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-101.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CPAC at -0.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-48.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CPAC at -2.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.17%
SBC growth of 30.17% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-455.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CPAC at -122.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while CPAC is negative at -114.75%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
66.87%
Inventory growth well above CPAC's 37.63%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CPAC at -136.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-76.09%
Both negative yoy, with CPAC at -1085.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-121.11%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CPAC at -217.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
64.19%
Some CapEx rise while CPAC is negative at -7.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
93.40%
Some acquisitions while CPAC is negative at -71.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
93.55%
Purchases well above CPAC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -132.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
83.83%
We have mild expansions while CPAC is negative at -9.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
118.93%
We repay more while CPAC is negative at -151.31%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-80.00%
Negative yoy issuance while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
54.78%
Buyback growth of 54.78% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.