111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4000.00%
Some net income increase while CPAC is negative at -5.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
32.55%
D&A growth well above CPAC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.45%
Negative yoy SBC while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
108.31%
Well above CPAC's 114.54% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
189.86%
Inventory growth well above CPAC's 99.27%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. CPAC's 90.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
348.73%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x CPAC's 281.35%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-32.23%
Negative yoy CapEx while CPAC is 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
64.52%
Acquisition spending well above CPAC's 7.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-2900.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while CPAC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.06%
Growth well above CPAC's 201.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
15.85%
We have mild expansions while CPAC is negative at -8.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-191.55%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CPAC is 99.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-189.84%
We cut yoy buybacks while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.