PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.67%
Negative net income growth while CPAC stands at 12.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-27.31%
Negative yoy D&A while CPAC is 10.05%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CPAC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.62%
SBC growth of 8.62% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
223.47%
Less working capital growth vs. CPAC's 907.25%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth while CPAC is negative at -163.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-59.74%
Negative yoy inventory while CPAC is 33677.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while CPAC is 526.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
100.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CPAC's 792.19%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-3.21%
Both negative yoy, with CPAC at -663.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
20.40%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CPAC's 131.28%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-19.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -28.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-285.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -956.62%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
150.83%
Purchases well above CPAC's 15.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.19%
We reduce yoy other investing while CPAC is 666.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-79.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with CPAC at -12.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
1403.85%
We repay more while CPAC is negative at -5159.66%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.76%
We cut yoy buybacks while CPAC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.