PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1035.09%
Some net income increase while CPAC is negative at -25.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.80%
D&A growth well above CPAC's 2.94%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
745.04%
Deferred tax of 745.04% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
10.00%
SBC growth of 10.00% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
59.34%
Well above CPAC's 106.94% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-218.87%
AR is negative yoy while CPAC is 120.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
135.44%
Some inventory rise while CPAC is negative at -95.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
258.35%
AP growth well above CPAC's 102.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
6.84%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CPAC's 90.52%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
2251.71%
Some yoy increase while CPAC is negative at -92.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
309.39%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CPAC's 691.91%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-22.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while CPAC is 8.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
102.12%
Some acquisitions while CPAC is negative at -11.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
176.92%
Purchases well above CPAC's 98.31%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.95%
We have some outflow growth while CPAC is negative at -50.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.22%
We have mild expansions while CPAC is negative at -14.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
57.72%
We repay more while CPAC is negative at -2039.82%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.75%
Buyback growth of 37.75% while CPAC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.